Trading Ability and Cost Correspondence
Taking the recent @SaharaLabsAI as an example, my cost advantage was originally quite good, with an IPO at 0.06, I could have sold directly after opening.
However, I saw everyone shilling, and then I also felt that the price had dropped almost enough to buy the dips, so I started buying.
Only later did I realize that I was the only one who actually invested with real money, belonging to the self-generated army, while many people were just paid to shill 😭.
In the end, I believed the story and bought in, they made up stories and took advertising fees and chose to sell, and then we all got what belonged to us 😮💨.
Fortunately, I timed my stop loss and sold the remaining few $SAHARA at the lowest point.
In the national trend group, many people were also asking if they could tell whether it was a genuine recommendation or an advertisement. Actually, it doesn't matter, as long as you buy in, you'll believe in it, after all, you're responsible for your own position 😭.
In the future, I'll play less on these exchanges. Recently, on-chain trading exchanges have cost money, and I haven't brought home a single cent.
The most important thing is that the costs don't match, and the trading methods are inconsistent when costs don't align. You can't let 0 and 1 be counterparties.
This circle is still suitable for playing with small stakes to win big.
What <物总> said about the trading system is indeed about practicing early. Anyway, I still don't have a system, I'm just playing randomly, and my reasons for going long or short are still: I want to.
And on the chain, it has become: I like it.
So it's indeed only suitable for a "dice rolling" approach, covering other costs if you hit one.
Going to sleep now, good night everyone.
